The film centers on David Richards (Mark Homer) the feckless investigator of the Green River Killings. He gets help from profiler Detective Tom Johnson (Paris Stangl) who in turn utilizes the insights of Ted Bundy (Richard Mark) who gives them the advice to capture the killer Gary Ridgway (Jared Nelson). Unfortunately, they didn't have the forensics they needed to charge him for another seven years.

For a murder/slasher film it lacked action other than Mark Homer raising a coffee cup to his lips. It was a very boring docudrama with wooden acting.

Guide: No swearing, sex, or nudity.

Many people will of course be aware of Ted Bundy, and the hideous crimes he committed, so there is a story here....

....sadly the story isn't enough to make this decent or watchable in any possible way, unfortunately it is terrible.

I'm the first to moan on about Americans trying hard to do British accents, the same is also true in reverse, this set of Brits don't do an American accent well at all, it's like an episode of Murder, she wrote, the other way round.

I can see that they've tried to tell the story well, so that gets a star, however it just doesn't work, at every stage it feels amateur and cheap.

Remember The Ted Bundy story is harrowing, gut wrenching, one of the worst series of crimes of all time, this feels like an afternoon tea party.

Shocking sadly, 2/10.

Bundy and the Green River Killer is absolutely awful in every way, with especially atrocious acting.

So a body's found and two detectives go and sit in the bushes hoping the killer will come back and one in a million he does, while they're sitting there and then they yell out and he runs away, they split up and the killer clobbers the lead detective over the head and stands over him, the other detective arrives, both getting a good look at the killer and he's able to run away again. They bring him in for questioning later on, because of something else and don't recognize him but seem sure it's him. They put him on a lie detector test and ask him if he killed so and so, well no because why would he know the bloody random prostitute's name.. so stupid. The way it involves the daughter and showing and discussing that the killer watches the public address, it has to be assumed that the killer would go after his daughter. Now that would of been predictable, but it couldn't of been worse than this dull ending.

Have to agree with some of the other reviews, as to whether this is someone's school project or something.