The blurb directly underneath the title page for this film here on IMDb calls it 'an alchemic mix of fact and fantasy', but to my mind, what's the point of putting fictional elements into the story? If you're a die hard Dylan fan you might be able to spot the fictional elements, however a casual observer would probably take the entire narrative at face value. This was directed by Martin Scorsese, who also did the honors for the 2005 American Masters episode on Dylan titled "No Direction Home". That look at the fabled singer and song writer seemed to take pains to emphasize that he wasn't all that political, revealing a contrast between him and folk singer Joan Baez, who wanted urgently to do political stuff while Dylan wanted to do songs. Here it seems just the opposite, as lengthy segments show Dylan deliberating on then current events while penning 'The Ballad of Ira Hayes' and 'Hurricane', regarding the imprisonment of boxer Rubin Carter.

The Rolling Thunder Revue took place during 1975, and depending on your preference, the name derives from a series of thunder claps impacting Dylan's consciousness, an Indian name for speaking truth, or a code name for a bombing mission during the Vietnam War. The 'speaking truth' part is given further resonance by Dylan appearing in whiteface during his performances, because in his own words, a man wearing a mask will tell you the truth about what he's thinking. Which for Dylan, was apparently personal enough that he didn't share much of his own thinking. Again, this is highlighted much clearer in 'No Direction Home', which demonstrated that he was unable or unwilling to verbalize a coherent answer when questioned by interviewers and fans.

Appearing on screen to offer their thoughts about Dylan and the tour are fellow musicians like Joni Mitchell, Roger McGuinn and Ramblin' Jack Elliott, along with actress Sharon Stone, who's first concert experience of Dylan occurred when her mother dragged her along to see the show. She admits being embarrassed when Bob stated that he wrote 'Just Like a Woman' for her, though she did find out later from T-Bone Burnett that the tune was written at least ten years earlier.

As far as the performances go, this viewer wasn't impressed. Though the picture includes a good number of well known Dylan songs, listening to them can be hard on the ears. I direct your attention to 'Simple Twist of Fate' where Dylan goes off key a few times when his voice trails off. In every case, the recorded album versions of his songs are much better than what you hear in the revue footage. For many viewers however, you will experience Dylan songs that you haven't heard before, like the couple of tunes mentioned earlier.

So is this a worthwhile doc to watch? I think you'll actually have to experience it to know for yourself. Again, the die hards are probably in for a treat, whereas the casual observer might be put off by the extensive interviews and insertion of fictional elements. It's pretty long too at almost two and a half hours, so be advised going in.

I am a sucker for films that canonize the performers of the Dylan era. The strength of this endless film are the performances as historical representations. However, whatever the point is is beyond me. There seems to be little overriding point to this. Thematically, we are set adrift. The interviews are disjointed and random, but never seemed to have a center. Dylan never seemed very excited about having been part of this. Still, it has enough pizzazz that it keeps us old guys interested. Maybe too much submergence into the bizarre for bizarre's sake.

Directed by Martin Scorsese, a documentary on Bob Dylan's 1975 Rolling Thunder Revue concert tour. Includes interviews with Dylan and many of the other personnel involved, plus footage from the concerts.

Superb. Despite being a fan of both Dylan and Scorsese, I had my doubts as to how interesting this could be. At 142 minutes I had fears it would be a long, dry telling of the concert tour.

I needn't have worried. Scorsese has great form in covering rock 'n roll: The Last Waltz, his film on The Band's last concert, is, for me, the great concert film ever made. 'George Harrison: Living In the Material World' and 'Shine a Light" (a Rolling Stones concert film/documentary) were also great. Here he blends documentary-style and concert film in a wonderful capturing of the great Bob Dylan at his most happy, carefree and entertaining.

Despite being a massive Bob Dylan fan, my impression of Dylan as a live performer was generally not too positive. From attending two of his concerts and seeing footage of his old concerts, his stage presence seemed rather wooden. The Rolling Thunder Revue, however, was different. Here he played to smaller audiences and seemed much more relaxed, friendly and spontaneous. The footage captures this well, with closeups of his face during songs, showing the intensity and creativity of his performance.

Martin Scorsese uses this footage well, editing it perfectly to produce a seamless blend of live footage, behind-the-scenes footage and interviews. This gives a good feel of what it must have been like on the tour, as well as witnessing the performances, plus the personal side (the Joan Baez-Bob Dylan interactions are particularly interesting and emotional, especially if you know their history).

The sheer cumulative creativity and musical ability of the Revue is staggering: Dylan, Baez, Joni Mitchell, Mick Ronson, Allen Ginsburg, Roger McGuinn, T Bone Burnett, Ramblin' Jack Elliott, Scarlet Rivera. The hangers-on even include Sharon Stone and Sam Shepherd! There's a wonderful feeling of great artists and musicians just relaxing and doing what they do best.

The 142 minutes just fly by.

A must-see for Dylan fans. For the most benefit from the film, a knowledge of Dylan's work and history is very useful. However, viewers less familiar with his work should still find it interesting. At the very least, the music is superb and that doesn't require any prior knowledge.